tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13393846.post8671591901298717191..comments2024-03-14T18:52:25.341-07:00Comments on Ill Folks: DID YOU MEAN "CAPTION CLAW?" Oh, Captain Crawl!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13393846.post-66279628770473219752010-06-20T07:35:36.967-07:002010-06-20T07:35:36.967-07:00Thanks for the heads up, Chris!
I agree, indexing...Thanks for the heads up, Chris!<br /><br />I agree, indexing entire posts would only do what Google does...turn up a lot of useless idiocy (like those bloggers who seem to think we want their lists of what they've been listening to lately). <br /><br />Will try and make sure the artists are in the titles from now on. The Captain concept is still young (in its crawling state) but already is becoming first choice among searchers (and it's hard to find The Searchers without it)Ill Folkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08208537275049364194noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13393846.post-41602902944205812752010-06-19T17:38:30.227-07:002010-06-19T17:38:30.227-07:00hey, this is chris from captaincrawl.com. To under...hey, this is chris from captaincrawl.com. To understand the problem you have to know captaincrawl uses POST TITLES to create a result set. so this means if you are writing 1000 times "band xyz" in a post CC will not find this until there's "band xyz" in the TITLE ! in 99,99% this works perfectly aber 100x times better than indexing the entire post content. maybe in autumn 2010 can handle embedded mp3s, i don't know yet... cheers from captaincrawlCaptainCrawlhttp://www.captaincrawl.comnoreply@blogger.com